Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 09:47

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sony’s DualSense Edge controller is receiving a rare $30 discount - The Verge
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
How did my ex move on very fast?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Samsung closed the One UI 8 beta to new users in the US after barely a day - 9to5Google
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
A runway under construction at Newark's beleaguered airport reopens early - NPR
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
5 Things to Know Before the Stock Market Opens - Yahoo Finance